Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025
Xiaomi
79 Gesamtbewertung
vs
KINGRID T90 11" T90(8+128) Blue 2025
KINGRID
50 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Entertainment
Art Design
Reading
Productivity
Student
Business
Spezifikationen
| Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 | KINGRID T90 11" T90(8+128) | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 12 GB★ | 8 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB★ | 128 GB |
| Expandable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 11.2" | 11" |
| Resolution | 3200 px★ | 1920 px |
| Panel | LCD | — |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz★ | — |
| Brightness | 800 nits★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E★ | WiFi 5 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4★ | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| USB-C | 1★ | — |
| Cellular | ✗ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fingerprint Reader | ✓★ | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 0.54 kg |
| OS | HyperOS 2 | Android 16 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025
- Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong cpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong gpu (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong storage (89th percentile)89th %ile
KINGRID T90 11" T90(8+128) Blue 2025
- Strong battery (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong cpu (71st percentile)
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Strong gpu (68th percentile)
- Below average screen (29th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (29th percentile)
Preise
Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 20250.143Score pro Dollar
vs
KINGRID T90 11" T90(8+128) Blue 20250.335Score pro Dollar
KINGRID T90 11" T90(8+128) Blue 2025 bietet 2.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779
Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.
