Micron 4TB SSD

Micron 4TB SSD

Micron
96 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingshark Gamer 512GB SATA III mSATA

Kingshark Gamer 512GB SATA III mSATA

Kingshark Gamer
27 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
Micron
96
Kingshark Gamer
7
Gaming
Micron
94
Kingshark Gamer
16
Workstation
Micron
89
Kingshark Gamer
22
Laptop
Micron
82
Kingshark Gamer
29
Budget
Micron
82
Kingshark Gamer
70
Portable
Micron
26
Kingshark Gamer
6

Spezifikationen

Micron 4TB SSDKingshark Gamer
Drive
Capacity
4,000
512
Form FactorM.2 2280mSATA
InterfacePCIe 5.0SATA III
ProtocolNVMeSATA
PCIe Generation5★—
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,500
Keine Daten
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,800
Keine Daten
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,300,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLC★—
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllerMicron—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
2,400
Keine Daten
MTBF (hours)
1,500,000
1,940,000
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Vor- & Nachteile

Micron 4TB SSD

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (12th percentile)12th %ile

Kingshark Gamer 512GB SATA III mSATA

  • Strong affordability (78th percentile)
  • Below average speed (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average endurance (32nd percentile)

Preise

Kingshark Gamer 512GB SATA III mSATA is 500 $ cheaper (6.1x less).

Micron 4TB SSD0.160Score pro Dollar
vs
Kingshark Gamer 512GB SATA III mSATA0.272Score pro Dollar

Kingshark Gamer 512GB SATA III mSATA bietet 1.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Kingshark Gamer 512GB SATA III mSATA

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Micron 4TB SSD

Scores 96 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.

Micron 4TB SSD Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen