Lexar NM1090 PRO
Lexar
86 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Ridata A801
Ridata
52 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Laptop
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Console
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Lexar NM1090 PRO | Ridata A801 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | Keine Daten | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | Keine Daten | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | Keine Daten | |
| MTBF (hours) | Keine Daten | |
| Warranty (years) | — | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Lexar NM1090 PRO
- Strong random (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong speed (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong feature (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average social proof (28th percentile)
Ridata A801
- Strong speed (65th percentile)
- Below average capacity (26th percentile)
Preise
Lexar NM1090 PRO0.118Score pro Dollar
vs
Ridata A8010.537Score pro Dollar
Ridata A801 bietet 4.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Lexar NM1090 PRO
Scores 86 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 16 specs.
