Team Group T-Force M200 1TB Portable USB 3.2 Gen 2x2
Team Group
39 Gesamtbewertung
vs
SanDisk 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 2280
SanDisk
92 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Console
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Budget
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Team Group T-Force M200 | SanDisk 4TB SSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | External | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Protocol | — | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | — | 4★ |
| External | ✓ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | Keine Daten | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | Keine Daten | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | — | TLC★ |
| DRAM Cache | — | ✓★ |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | Keine Daten | |
| MTBF (hours) | Keine Daten | |
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | 3 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✓★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Team Group T-Force M200 1TB Portable USB 3.2 Gen 2x2
- Strong affordability (67th percentile)
- Below average random (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
SanDisk 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (9th percentile)9th %ile
Preise
Team Group T-Force M200 1TB Portable USB 3.2 Gen 2x20.215Score pro Dollar
vs
SanDisk 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 22800.142Score pro Dollar
Team Group T-Force M200 1TB Portable USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: SanDisk 4TB SSD
Scores 92 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 16 specs.
