Netac Zslim 500GB Portable USB 3.2 Gen 2
Netac
24 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280
Kingston
98 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Laptop
Workstation
Gaming
Console
Budget
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Netac Zslim | Kingston SSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | External | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | USB 3.2 Gen 2 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Protocol | — | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | — | 5★ |
| External | ✓ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | Keine Daten | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | Keine Daten | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | — | TLC★ |
| DRAM Cache | — | ✓★ |
| Controller | — | SM2508 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | Keine Daten | |
| Warranty (years) | 3 | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Netac Zslim 500GB Portable USB 3.2 Gen 2
- Strong affordability (78th percentile)
- Below average random (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average speed (22nd percentile)
- Below average capacity (27th percentile)
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong endurance (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
Preise
Netac Zslim 500GB Portable USB 3.2 Gen 20.255Score pro Dollar
vs
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 22800.086Score pro Dollar
Netac Zslim 500GB Portable USB 3.2 Gen 2 bietet 3.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Kingston SSD
Scores 98 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 16 specs.
