Crucial CT51264BF160BJ 4GB DDR3-1600

Crucial CT51264BF160BJ 4GB DDR3-1600

Crucial
29 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Netac

Netac

Netac
58 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Crucial
75
Netac
82
Workstation
Crucial
19
Netac
63
Gaming
Crucial
23
Netac
61
Laptop
Crucial
38
Netac
44
Server
Crucial
11
Netac
30

Spezifikationen

Crucial CT51264BF160BJNetac
Memory
TypeDDR3DDR4★
Form FactorSODIMMUDIMM
Total Capacity
4,096
32,768
Modules12★
Per Module
4,096
16,384
Pins204288
Rank1Rx8—
Performance
Speed
1,600
3,200
CAS Latency11★16
Voltage1.3500000238418581.350000023841858
Class
ECC✗✗
Registered✗✗
OC Profile—Intel XMP 2.0
Features
RGB—✗
Heat Spreader✗✓★

Vor- & Nachteile

Crucial CT51264BF160BJ 4GB DDR3-1600

  • Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Below average capacity (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile

Netac

  • Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong affordability (79th percentile)
  • Strong feature (75th percentile)
  • Strong capacity (71st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Preise

Crucial CT51264BF160BJ 4GB DDR3-1600 is 44 $ cheaper (2.6x less).

Crucial CT51264BF160BJ 4GB DDR3-16001.079Score pro Dollar
vs
Netac0.813Score pro Dollar

Crucial CT51264BF160BJ 4GB DDR3-1600 bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Crucial CT51264BF160BJ 4GB DDR3-1600

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Netac

Scores 58 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 15 specs.

Netac Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopServerWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen