Kingston ValueRAM DDR3 Green

Kingston ValueRAM DDR3 Green

Kingston
15 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Netac

Netac

Netac
59 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Kingston
67
Netac
85
Workstation
Kingston
12
Netac
65
Gaming
Kingston
12
Netac
63
Laptop
Kingston
10
Netac
46
Server
Kingston
7
Netac
31

Spezifikationen

Kingston ValueRAMNetac
Memory
TypeDDR3DDR4★
Form FactorUDIMMUDIMM
Total Capacity
512
32,768
Modules12★
Per Module
512
16,384
Pins184288
Performance
SpeedKeine Daten
3,200
CAS Latency—16★
Voltage—1.350000023841858★
Class
ECC✗✗
Registered✗✗
OC Profile—Intel XMP 2.0
Features
RGB✗✗
Heat Spreader✗✓★

Vor- & Nachteile

Kingston ValueRAM DDR3 Green

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong affordability (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Below average latency (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average speed (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average capacity (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile

Netac

  • Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong affordability (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong feature (75th percentile)
  • Strong capacity (71st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Preise

Kingston ValueRAM DDR3 Green is 38 $ cheaper (2.1x less).

Kingston ValueRAM DDR3 Green0.453Score pro Dollar
vs
Netac0.837Score pro Dollar

Netac bietet 1.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Kingston ValueRAM DDR3 Green

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Netac

Scores 59 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 8 of 14 specs.

Netac Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopServerWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen