Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4

Kingston
26 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Netac

Netac

Netac
58 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Workstation
Kingston
19
Netac
63
Gaming
Kingston
23
Netac
61
Budget
Kingston
39
Netac
56
Laptop
Kingston
20
Netac
44
Server
Kingston
10
Netac
29

Spezifikationen

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4Netac
Memory
TypeDDR3LDDR4★
Form FactorUDIMMUDIMM
Total Capacity
4,096
32,768
Modules12★
Per Module
4,096
16,384
Pins240288
Performance
Speed
1,600
3,200
CAS Latency11★16
Voltage1.3500000238418581.350000023841858
Class
ECC✗✗
Registered✗✗
OC Profile—Intel XMP 2.0
Features
RGB✗✗
Heat Spreader—✓★

Vor- & Nachteile

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4

  • Below average capacity (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile

Netac

  • Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong feature (73rd percentile)
  • Strong capacity (71st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Preise

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4 is 65 $ cheaper (11.9x less).

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/44.307Score pro Dollar
vs
Netac0.810Score pro Dollar

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4 bietet 5.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Kingston KCP3L16NS8/4

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Netac

Scores 58 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 14 specs.

Netac Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopServerWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen