OWC
OWC
35 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingston KF568C34BBEA-16
Kingston
76 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Spezifikationen
| OWC | Kingston KF568C34BBEA-16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | SODIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 260 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 19★ | 34 |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158★ | 1.399999976158142 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✓★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
OWC
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
Kingston KF568C34BBEA-16
- Strong speed (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (66th percentile)
- Strong social proof (65th percentile)
Preise
OWC0.645Score pro Dollar
vs
Kingston KF568C34BBEA-160.202Score pro Dollar
OWC bietet 3.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Kingston KF568C34BBEA-16
Scores 76 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 15 specs.
