Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W
Corsair
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingston KVR16N11H/8
Kingston
34 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Workstation
Budget
Laptop
Server
Spezifikationen
| Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W | Kingston KVR16N11H/8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5★ | DDR3 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 240 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 32 | 11★ |
| Timings | 32-40-40-84 | — |
| Voltage | 1.399999976158142★ | 1.5 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
Kingston KVR16N11H/8
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
Preise
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W0.077Score pro Dollar
vs
Kingston KVR16N11H/80.800Score pro Dollar
Kingston KVR16N11H/8 bietet 10.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W
Scores 95 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 8 of 15 specs.
