MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026

MSI
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
KTC H32S17C 32"

KTC H32S17C 32"

KTC
66 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Office
MSI
87
KTC
59
Professional
MSI
85
KTC
47
Gaming
MSI
84
KTC
64
Creative
MSI
84
KTC
49
Entertainment
MSI
77
KTC
60
Portable
MSI
14
KTC
6

Spezifikationen

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"KTC H32S17C 32"
Display
Size27"32"
Resolution2560 x 14401920 x 1080
Panel TypeQD-OLEDVA
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Curvature1,500
Performance
Refresh Rate240 Hz165 Hz
Response Time0.029999999329447746 ms1 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium ProFreeSync Premium
Color & HDR
Brightness1000 nits350 nits
Color Gamut99% DCI-P3122% sRGB
Color Depth10-bit8-bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400HDR
HDR SupportHDRHDR
Connectivity
HDMI Ports22
DisplayPort11
USB-C1
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Weight8.00 kg8.35 kg

Vor- & Nachteile

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026

  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile

KTC H32S17C 32"

  • Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong performance (78th percentile)
  • Strong color (72nd percentile)
  • Below average portability (4th percentile)4th %ile

Preise

KTC H32S17C 32" is 387 $ cheaper (3.5x less).

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 20260.176Score pro Dollar
vs
KTC H32S17C 32"0.428Score pro Dollar

KTC H32S17C 32" bietet 2.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026

KTC H32S17C 32"

Fazit

Gewinner: MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"

Scores 95 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 28 specs.

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" Besser bei:

GamingOfficeCreativePortableProfessionalEntertainment

Auch in Betracht ziehen