ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDPG 27" Black 2025
ASUS
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32" Metallic Black 2026
MSI
94 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Professional
Office
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Spezifikationen
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDPG 27" | MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 32" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED | OLED |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,700 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 500 Hz★ | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync | G-Sync Compatible |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 1000 nits | 1000 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3 | 1.07 Billion |
| Color Depth | 10-bit | 10-bit |
| HDR | DisplayHDR True Black 500 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 2★ | 1 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✗ |
| Power | 65W★ | — |
| Weight | 6.60 kg★ | 9.60 kg |
Vor- & Nachteile
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDPG 27" Black 2025
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32" Metallic Black 2026
- Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong color (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (92th percentile)92th %ile
Preise
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDPG 27" Black 20250.134Score pro Dollar
vs
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32" Metallic Black 20260.107Score pro Dollar
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDPG 27" Black 2025 bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32"
Scores 94 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 0 of 29 specs.
