Acer Predator X32 Xbmiipphuzx 31.5" Black 2026
Acer
84 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3818DW 38" Black 2018
Dell
45 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Entertainment
Office
Creative
Professional
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Acer Predator X32 Xbmiipphuzx 31.5" | Dell UltraSharp U3818DW 38" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 31.5" | 38" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 1600 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | ✓ |
| Curvature | 1,700 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 5 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 1000 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | DCI-P3 99% | — |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | — |
| HDR | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 2★ | 1 |
| USB-C | 1★ | — |
| Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | — |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓★ | — |
| Pivot | ✗ | — |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Power | 285W | 56W★ |
| Weight | 6.69 kg★ | 12.11 kg |
Vor- & Nachteile
Acer Predator X32 Xbmiipphuzx 31.5" Black 2026
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
Dell UltraSharp U3818DW 38" Black 2018
- Strong display (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong connectivity (67th percentile)
- Below average social proof (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average performance (22nd percentile)
- Below average portability (24th percentile)
Preise
Acer Predator X32 Xbmiipphuzx 31.5" Black 20260.133Score pro Dollar
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3818DW 38" Black 20180.037Score pro Dollar
Acer Predator X32 Xbmiipphuzx 31.5" Black 2026 bietet 3.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Acer Predator X32 Xbmiipphuzx 31.5"
Scores 84 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 29 specs.
