Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5" Black 2025
Dell
85 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Samsung CF390 LC27F390FHNXGO 27" Black 2023
Samsung
38 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Office
Creative
Entertainment
Gaming
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5" | Samsung CF390 LC27F390FHNXGO 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 31.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | IPS★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,800 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 5 ms★ | — |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Compatible★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 600 nits★ | — |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 100% sRGB | — |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | — |
| HDR | HDR | — |
| HDR Support | HDR | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1★ | — |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | — |
| USB-C | 1★ | — |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Speakers | ✗ | — |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | — |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓★ | — |
| Pivot | ✓★ | — |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 75x75 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | ✓★ | — |
| Power | 31W★ | — |
| Weight | 7.06 kg | 6.34 kg★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5" Black 2025
- Strong color (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile
Samsung CF390 LC27F390FHNXGO 27" Black 2023
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Below average connectivity (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average portability (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average color (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average performance (22nd percentile)
Preise
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5" Black 20250.106Score pro Dollar
vs
Samsung CF390 LC27F390FHNXGO 27" Black 20230.198Score pro Dollar
Samsung CF390 LC27F390FHNXGO 27" Black 2023 bietet 1.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5"
Scores 85 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 30 specs.
