ASUS ZenScreen MB16FC 16" Black

ASUS ZenScreen MB16FC 16" Black

ASUS
46 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 2026

Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 2026

Dell
87 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Portable
ASUS
88
Dell
16
Office
ASUS
37
Dell
85
Professional
ASUS
37
Dell
78
Creative
ASUS
38
Dell
75
Entertainment
ASUS
31
Dell
65
Gaming
ASUS
33
Dell
60

Spezifikationen

ASUS ZenScreen MB16FC 16"Dell S2725QC 27"
Display
Size16"27"
Resolution1920 x 12003840 x 2160
Panel TypeIPSIPS
Aspect Ratio16:1016:9
Curved
Performance
Refresh Rate75 Hz120 Hz
Response Time5 ms8 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium
Color & HDR
Brightness300 nits350 nits
Color Gamut99% sRGB
HDRHDR
HDR SupportHDR
Connectivity
HDMI Ports12
DisplayPort1
USB-C21
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Power5W25W
Weight0.90 kg6.50 kg

Vor- & Nachteile

ASUS ZenScreen MB16FC 16" Black

  • Strong portability (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (75th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
  • Strong connectivity (71st percentile)
  • Below average ergonomic (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average feature (23rd percentile)

Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 2026

  • Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile

Preise

ASUS ZenScreen MB16FC 16" Black is 190 $ cheaper (2.7x less).

ASUS ZenScreen MB16FC 16" Black0.416Score pro Dollar
vs
Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 20260.290Score pro Dollar

ASUS ZenScreen MB16FC 16" Black bietet 1.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: Dell S2725QC 27"

Scores 87 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 27 specs.

ASUS ZenScreen MB16FC 16" Besser bei:

Portable

Dell S2725QC 27" Besser bei:

GamingOfficeCreativeProfessionalEntertainment

Auch in Betracht ziehen