Planar Helium PCT2785 27" Black
Planar
37 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
Alienware
81 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Office
Entertainment
Creative
Professional
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Planar Helium PCT2785 27" | Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 32" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | — | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,500 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | — | 180 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 12 ms | 1 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 264 nits | 400 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 16.7 Million Colors | DCI-P3 95% |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | — | 0★ |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Power | 43W | 33W★ |
| Weight | 8.85 kg★ | 9.19 kg |
Vor- & Nachteile
Planar Helium PCT2785 27" Black
- Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (67th percentile)
- Below average performance (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
- Below average color (35th percentile)
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong color (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average portability (15th percentile)15th %ile
Preise
Planar Helium PCT2785 27" Black0.072Score pro Dollar
vs
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo0.310Score pro Dollar
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo bietet 4.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32"
Scores 81 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 25 specs.
