Dell Alienware AW2524HF 24.5" Black
Dell
49 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
Alienware
81 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Office
Entertainment
Creative
Professional
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Dell Alienware AW2524HF 24.5" | Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 24.5" | 32" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | — | 16:9 |
| Curved | — | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,500 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 500 Hz★ | 180 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.5 ms★ | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium★ | FreeSync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | — | 400 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | DCI-P3 95% |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | — | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | — | 0★ |
| Speakers | — | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✗ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓★ | — |
| Pivot | ✓★ | — |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| Power | — | 33W★ |
| Weight | — | 9.19 kg★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Dell Alienware AW2524HF 24.5" Black
- Strong performance (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (78th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average portability (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong color (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average portability (15th percentile)15th %ile
Preise
Dell Alienware AW2524HF 24.5" Black0.089Score pro Dollar
vs
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo0.310Score pro Dollar
Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32" Interstellar Indigo bietet 3.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Alienware AW-Series AW3225DM 32"
Scores 81 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 6 of 27 specs.
