VisionOwl V16QH

VisionOwl V16QH

VisionOwl
61 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M

MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M

MSI
88 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
VisionOwl
53
MSI
98
Portable
VisionOwl
95
MSI
15
Creative
VisionOwl
56
MSI
92
Office
VisionOwl
52
MSI
89
Gaming
VisionOwl
44
MSI
84
Entertainment
VisionOwl
44
MSI
76

Spezifikationen

VisionOwl V16QHMSI MPG 274URDFW E16M
Display
Size16"27"
Resolution2560 x 16003840 x 2160
Panel TypeIPSIPS
Aspect Ratio16:1016:9
Curved—✗
Performance
Refresh Rate144 Hz160 Hz★
Response Time—0.5 ms★
Adaptive Sync—Adaptive-Sync
Color & HDR
Brightness470 nits★400 nits
Color Gamut110% sRGB100% Adobe RGB, 98% DCI-P3, 140% sRGB
Color Depth8-bit + 2FRC10-bit★
HDRHDRDisplayHDR 1000
HDR SupportHDRHDR1000★
Connectivity
HDMI Ports12★
DisplayPort—1★
USB-C2★1
Thunderbolt—No
Speakers✓★✗
Headphone Jack—✓★
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable—✓★
Tilt✓✓
Swivel—✓★
Pivot—✓★
VESA Mount—100x100
Features
Webcam—✗
Touchscreen—✗
PIP/PBP—✓★
Weight0.67 kg★8.20 kg

Vor- & Nachteile

VisionOwl V16QH

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong portability (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong color (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average display (22nd percentile)

MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M

  • Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong performance (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Preise

VisionOwl V16QH is 309 $ cheaper (2.7x less).

VisionOwl V16QH0.341Score pro Dollar
vs
MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M0.179Score pro Dollar

VisionOwl V16QH bietet 1.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

★ Gewinner: MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M

Scores 88 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 28 specs.

VisionOwl V16QH Besser bei:

Portable

MSI MPG 274URDFW E16M Besser bei:

GamingOfficeCreativeProfessionalEntertainment

Auch in Betracht ziehen