ASUS TUF Gaming VG328QA1A 32" BLACK 2023
ASUS
64 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5" Black 2025
Dell
85 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Office
Creative
Entertainment
Gaming
Portable
Spezifikationen
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG328QA1A 32" | Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 32" | 31.5" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | VA | IPS★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 170 Hz★ | 120 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms★ | 5 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits | 600 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 100% sRGB | 99% DCI-P3, 100% sRGB |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | — | HDR |
| HDR Support | — | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | — | 1★ |
| Thunderbolt | No | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Power | 24W★ | 31W |
| Weight | 6.80 kg★ | 7.06 kg |
Vor- & Nachteile
ASUS TUF Gaming VG328QA1A 32" BLACK 2023
- Strong connectivity (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong performance (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong social proof (79th percentile)
- Strong ergonomic (73rd percentile)
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (28th percentile)
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5" Black 2025
- Strong color (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile
Preise
ASUS TUF Gaming VG328QA1A 32" BLACK 20230.323Score pro Dollar
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5" Black 20250.106Score pro Dollar
ASUS TUF Gaming VG328QA1A 32" BLACK 2023 bietet 3.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Dell UltraSharp U3225QE 31.5"
Scores 85 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 29 specs.
