Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White
Aten Technology
20 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Samsung
93 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Creative
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" | Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 18.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1200 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | — | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 500 Hz★ |
| Response Time | — | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | — | 99% (CIE1976) |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | — | HDR10+ |
| HDR Support | — | HDR10+★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | — | 3★ |
| Speakers | — | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | — | ✓★ |
| Tilt | — | ✓★ |
| Swivel | — | ✓★ |
| Pivot | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✗ |
| Power | — | 140W★ |
| Weight | 14.51 kg | 6.90 kg★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White
- Below average social proof (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average ergonomic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average performance (23rd percentile)
- Below average feature (24th percentile)
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 2025
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
Preise
Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White0.011Score pro Dollar
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 20250.154Score pro Dollar
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 2025 bietet 14.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27"
Scores 93 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 28 specs.
