Samsung Tizen Kiosk KM24A 24"
Samsung
40 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW 34" Interstellar Indigo 2026
Alienware
92 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Gaming
Entertainment
Professional
Creative
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Samsung Tizen Kiosk KM24A 24" | Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW 34" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 24" | 34" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 3440 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,800 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 240 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 14 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 250 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 72% NTSC | 99.3% DCI-P3 |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 400 True Black |
| HDR Support | — | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | — | 1★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | 0 |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | — | ✓★ |
| Tilt | — | ✓★ |
| Swivel | — | ✓★ |
| Pivot | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 200x200 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | — |
| Power | 50W | 37W★ |
| Weight | 4.40 kg★ | 9.09 kg |
Vor- & Nachteile
Samsung Tizen Kiosk KM24A 24"
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Below average performance (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average connectivity (34th percentile)
- Below average ergonomic (35th percentile)
Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW 34" Interstellar Indigo 2026
- Strong color (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
Preise
Samsung Tizen Kiosk KM24A 24"0.057Score pro Dollar
vs
Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW 34" Interstellar Indigo 20260.127Score pro Dollar
Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW 34" Interstellar Indigo 2026 bietet 2.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW 34"
Scores 92 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 29 specs.
