Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" Black 2022
Samsung
86 Gesamtbewertung
vs
ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QR 27" BLACK 2021
ASUS
55 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Gaming
Entertainment
Professional
Creative
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" | ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QR 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 32" | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | VA | IPS★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | — |
| Curvature | 1,000 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 165 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits★ | — |
| Color Gamut | 95% DCI-P3 | — |
| Color Depth | 8-bit+FRC★ | — |
| HDR | HDR | — |
| HDR Support | HDR | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 2★ | — |
| Thunderbolt | 0 | — |
| Speakers | ✓★ | — |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | — |
| Weight | 7.40 kg | 5.60 kg★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" Black 2022
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong performance (89th percentile)89th %ile
ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QR 27" BLACK 2021
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong performance (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average portability (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average color (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average feature (24th percentile)
Preise
Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" Black 20220.215Score pro Dollar
vs
ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QR 27" BLACK 20210.278Score pro Dollar
ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QR 27" BLACK 2021 bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32"
Scores 86 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 6 of 29 specs.
