ASUS ROG Strix XG259QNG-W 24" White 2024
ASUS
69 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
MSI
95 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Spezifikationen
| ASUS ROG Strix XG259QNG-W 24" | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 24.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 380 Hz★ | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 400 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | sRGB 110% | 99% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 8-bit | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | HDR400 | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 0 | 1★ |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Power | 22W★ | — |
| Weight | 5.90 kg★ | 8.00 kg |
Vor- & Nachteile
ASUS ROG Strix XG259QNG-W 24" White 2024
- Strong performance (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong color (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong feature (72nd percentile)
- Below average portability (32nd percentile)
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
Preise
ASUS ROG Strix XG259QNG-W 24" White 20240.314Score pro Dollar
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 20260.176Score pro Dollar
ASUS ROG Strix XG259QNG-W 24" White 2024 bietet 1.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"
Scores 95 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 28 specs.
