Sigma 203101
Sigma
46 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm
Nikon
75 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Budget
Travel
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Spezifikationen
| Sigma 203101 | Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 8 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 400 mm |
| Elements | — | 21 |
| Groups | — | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 4 | 4 |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4.5 | 22-45★ |
| Min Aperture | 4.5-5.6 | 4-8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.56 kg★ | 0.72 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | HSM | STM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 239 mm | 200 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.12x | 1:2.86★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma 203101
- Strong optical (76th percentile)
- Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
- Below average build (23rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm
- Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Preise
Sigma 2031010.094Score pro Dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm0.065Score pro Dollar
Sigma 203101 bietet 1.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm
Scores 75 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.
