Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Sony
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma 723-306 135-400mm
Sigma
46 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Video Cinema
Street
Budget
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm | Sigma 723-306 135-400mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 135 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 400 mm |
| Elements | 9 | — |
| Groups | 8 | 5 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/4.5 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | 4.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Nikon F |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weight | 0.12 kg | 0.10 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping motor★ | — |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 249 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average macro (35th percentile)
Sigma 723-306 135-400mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong aperture (69th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (68th percentile)
- Below average macro (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average social proof (21th percentile)
Preise
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.298Score pro Dollar
vs
Sigma 723-306 135-400mm0.077Score pro Dollar
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm bietet 3.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 20 specs.
