Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

Meike
42 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Panasonic
95
Meike
29
Landscape
Panasonic
91
Meike
44
Travel
Panasonic
91
Meike
49
Budget
Panasonic
90
Meike
39
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Meike
27
Professional
Panasonic
85
Meike
34
Portrait
Panasonic
82
Meike
31
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
82
Meike
31
Street
Panasonic
82
Meike
39

Spezifikationen

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mmMeike MK-S-35mm 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm35 mm
Elements176
Groups135
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingFluorine coatingMulti-Layer Nano Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperture4-7.1f/1.7
Constant
Diaphragm Blades98
Build
MountL-MountSony E
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.41 kg0.18 kg
Filter Thread67 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusmanual focus only
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm300 mm
Max Magnification0.5x0.111x

Vor- & Nachteile

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong build (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Preise

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm is 728 $ cheaper (11.4x less).

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.110Score pro Dollar
vs
Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm0.600Score pro Dollar

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm bietet 5.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen