Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm

Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm

Viltrox
80 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

Meike
42 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Viltrox
80
Meike
30
Portrait
Viltrox
79
Meike
31
Street
Viltrox
70
Meike
39
Budget
Viltrox
67
Meike
39
Video Cinema
Viltrox
66
Meike
27
Professional
Viltrox
61
Meike
34
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
60
Meike
31
Travel
Viltrox
45
Meike
49
Landscape
Viltrox
44
Meike
44

Spezifikationen

Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mmMeike MK-S-35mm 35mm
Optics
Typeprime
Focal Length Min40 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm35 mm
Elements106
Groups65
CoatingMulti-Layer Nano Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.5f/22
Min Aperturef/1.7
Constant
Diaphragm Blades8
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.40 kg0.18 kg
Filter Thread49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMmanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance40 mm300 mm
Max Magnification0.111x

Vor- & Nachteile

Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm

  • Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Preise

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm is 98 $ cheaper (2.4x less).

Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm0.474Score pro Dollar
vs
Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm0.602Score pro Dollar

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

Fazit

Gewinner: Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm

Scores 80 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 19 specs.

Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm Besser bei:

Travel

Auch in Betracht ziehen