Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Nikon
80 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma 36B965
Sigma
35 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Budget
Portrait
Video Cinema
Professional
Street
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR | Sigma 36B965 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 45 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 45 mm |
| Elements | 17 | — |
| Groups | 12 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 2★ | — |
| Coating | Nano Crystal Coat | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | — |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weight | 0.68 kg★ | 4.13 kg |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Silent Wave Motor | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 2.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 290 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:4★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Strong stabilization (76th percentile)
- Strong versatility (74th percentile)
Sigma 36B965
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (30th percentile)
Preise
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR0.107Score pro Dollar
vs
Sigma 36B9650.070Score pro Dollar
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Scores 80 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.
