Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Nikon
80 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Tamron
93 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Budget
Portrait
Video Cinema
Macro
Landscape
Street
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR | Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 75 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 17 |
| Groups | 12 | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 2 |
| Coating | Nano Crystal Coat | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.68 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Silent Wave Motor | VXD |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 2.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 290 mm | 180 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:4 | 1:2.7 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
- Strong stabilization (76th percentile)
- Strong versatility (75th percentile)
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
- Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
Preise
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR0.107Score pro Dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G20.337Score pro Dollar
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 bietet 3.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Scores 93 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.
