Tamron A17-200 28-200mm
Tamron
45 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm
Fujifilm
79 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Macro
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Street
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Portrait
Spezifikationen
| Tamron A17-200 28-200mm | Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 18 mm |
| Elements | — | 15 |
| Groups | — | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | Super EBC coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.8 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | 3.8-5.6 | f/1.4 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Adaptall | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.08 kg★ | 0.37 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 200 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:6.67★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Tamron A17-200 28-200mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong aperture (76th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (74th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Preise
Tamron A17-200 28-200mm0.138Score pro Dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm0.075Score pro Dollar
Tamron A17-200 28-200mm bietet 1.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm
Scores 79 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
