Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Brightin Star 28mm F2.8 28mm
Brightin Star
42 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Macro
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Brightin Star 28mm F2.8 28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | — | 6 |
| Groups | — | 5 |
| Coating | — | MC multi-layer coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Leica M |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weight | — | 0.13 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 25 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 700 mm★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Brightin Star 28mm F2.8 28mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Preise
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064Score pro Dollar
vs
Brightin Star 28mm F2.8 28mm0.123Score pro Dollar
Brightin Star 28mm F2.8 28mm bietet 1.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 17 specs.
