Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
Canon
74 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Landscape
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Budget
Video Cinema
Travel
Macro
Street
Portrait
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Super Spectra coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon EF |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.61 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | USM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 280 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.23x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Preise
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064Score pro Dollar
vs
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM0.088Score pro Dollar
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM bietet 1.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
Scores 74 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 11 of 22 specs.
