Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E
Hasselblad
36 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 100 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 16 |
| Groups | 11 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 3 | 5★ |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 2.8-4 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Hasselblad XCD |
| Format | full-frame★ | medium-format |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 0.89 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 86 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor | stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 500 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26 | 1:4.0 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E
- Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average build (21st percentile)
Preise
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086Score pro Dollar
vs
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E0.008Score pro Dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 bietet 10.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
