Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony SEL20F18G

Sony SEL20F18G

Sony
64 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Sony
66
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sony
44
Street
Nikon
86
Sony
54
Budget
Nikon
86
Sony
57
Macro
Nikon
85
Sony
75
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sony
68
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sony
52
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sony
53
Travel
Nikon
75
Sony
56

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sony SEL20F18G
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm20 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm20 mm
Elements1314
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements32
ED Elements33
CoatingMulti-CoatedNano AR Coating and Fluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.37 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm180 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:5

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sony SEL20F18G

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Preise

Both products are similarly priced.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony SEL20F18G0.069Score pro Dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen