Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Fujifilm GF 45-100mm f/4 R LM WR
Fujifilm
61 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Fujifilm GF 45-100mm f/4 R LM WR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 45 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 100 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 16 |
| Groups | 11 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 2 |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Fujifilm G |
| Format | full-frame★ | medium-format |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 1.00 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 82 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 650 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | 0.13x |
Vor- & Nachteile
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Fujifilm GF 45-100mm f/4 R LM WR
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average bokeh (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average macro (31st percentile)
Preise
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086Score pro Dollar
vs
Fujifilm GF 45-100mm f/4 R LM WR0.023Score pro Dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 bietet 3.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
