Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sirui Venus E35 35mm
Sirui
28 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Sirui Venus E35 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 13 | — |
| Groups | 11 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | — |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.9 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 1.36 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor★ | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm | 35 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Sirui Venus E35 35mm
- Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average build (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
Preise
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086Score pro Dollar
vs
Sirui Venus E35 35mm0.027Score pro Dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 bietet 3.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
