Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm
Viltrox
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Leitz Cine HEKTOR 25mm T2.1 25mm
Leitz Cine
28 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Portrait
Video Cinema
Professional
Budget
Street
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm | Leitz Cine HEKTOR 25mm T2.1 25mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 27 mm | 25 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 27 mm | 25 mm |
| Elements | 15 | — |
| Groups | 11 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 1★ | — |
| ED Elements | 2★ | — |
| Coating | HD Nano multilayer coating with water-resistant and antifouling coating | Indirect flares |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.2 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.2 | f/2.1 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 11★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.56 kg★ | 0.77 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 280 mm★ | 305 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.15x★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm
- Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Leitz Cine HEKTOR 25mm T2.1 25mm
- Strong macro (68th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average bokeh (22nd percentile)
- Below average build (25th percentile)
Preise
Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm0.194Score pro Dollar
vs
Leitz Cine HEKTOR 25mm T2.1 25mm0.004Score pro Dollar
Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm bietet 48.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
