Meike

Meike

Meike
71 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E PZ SELP1650PS 16-50mm

Sony E PZ SELP1650PS 16-50mm

Sony
61 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Meike
51
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Meike
57
Sony
75
Macro
Meike
73
Sony
51
Landscape
Meike
60
Sony
72
Budget
Meike
67
Sony
63
Street
Meike
66
Sony
64
Portrait
Meike
64
Sony
34
Video Cinema
Meike
62
Sony
54
Professional
Meike
58
Sony
61

Spezifikationen

MeikeSony E PZ SELP1650PS 16-50mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min23 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max23 mm50 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements24
ED Elements11
Coatingmulti coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/32
Min Aperturef/1.4f/3.5
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.30 kg0.11 kg
Filter Thread58 mm40 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMLinear motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm250 mm
Max Magnification0.215x

Vor- & Nachteile

Meike

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (78th percentile)
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Sony E PZ SELP1650PS 16-50mm

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile

Preise

Meike is 68 $ cheaper (1.3x less).

Meike0.304Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E PZ SELP1650PS 16-50mm0.203Score pro Dollar

Meike bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: Meike

Scores 71 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 21 specs.

Meike Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitVideo Cinema

Sony E PZ SELP1650PS 16-50mm Besser bei:

TravelLandscapeProfessionalWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen