Tamron Di A037 17-35mm

Tamron Di A037 17-35mm

Tamron
65 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
84 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Street
Tamron
59
Sony
84
Travel
Tamron
59
Sony
82
Portrait
Tamron
71
Sony
80
Budget
Tamron
60
Sony
80
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
65
Sony
73
Video Cinema
Tamron
56
Sony
71
Professional
Tamron
62
Sony
71
Landscape
Tamron
52
Sony
68
Macro
Tamron
60
Sony
58

Spezifikationen

Tamron Di A037 17-35mmSony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min17 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm50 mm
Elements9
Groups8
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements1
Coatingprotective fluorine compound
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperture2.8-43.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountNikon FSony E
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.46 kg0.12 kg
Filter Thread41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeOSDPZ
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm249 mm
Max Magnification0.215x

Vor- & Nachteile

Tamron Di A037 17-35mm

  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Strong versatility (74th percentile)
  • Below average optical (34th percentile)

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

Preise

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm is 302 $ cheaper (2.0x less).

Tamron Di A037 17-35mm0.108Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.281Score pro Dollar

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm bietet 2.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Tamron Di A037 17-35mm

Fazit

Gewinner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Scores 84 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm Besser bei:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen