Zeiss Otus ML 35mm f/1.4 35mm
Zeiss
52 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Tamron
97 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Video Cinema
Budget
Macro
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Zeiss Otus ML 35mm f/1.4 35mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 15 | 16 |
| Groups | 11 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 5★ | 2 |
| Coating | ZEISS T* Antireflective Coating | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.4 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 10★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.70 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.72 | 1:4.8 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Zeiss Otus ML 35mm f/1.4 35mm
- Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong macro (71st percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
Preise
Zeiss Otus ML 35mm f/1.4 35mm0.030Score pro Dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm0.162Score pro Dollar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm bietet 5.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
