Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 XF 56mm
Viltrox
60 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Yongnuo
81 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Street
Landscape
Video Cinema
Travel
Budget
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 XF 56mm | Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 56 mm | 12 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 56 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 14 |
| Groups | 9 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Nano Surface Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.7 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/16 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | APS-C★ | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.17 kg★ | 0.32 kg |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | STM stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 550 mm | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:9.09★ | 0.5x |
Vor- & Nachteile
Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 XF 56mm
- Strong bokeh (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong aperture (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average social proof (35th percentile)
Preise
Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 XF 56mm0.418Score pro Dollar
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm0.225Score pro Dollar
Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 XF 56mm bietet 1.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Scores 81 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
