Sirui IronStar IRON-35-N 35mm
Sirui
39 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Portrait
Budget
Macro
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Spezifikationen
| Sirui IronStar IRON-35-N 35mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | — |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 20 | — |
| Groups | 16 | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 16★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Interchangeable Mount with Included ARRI PL/Canon EF | — |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weight | 1.00 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 92 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 650 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:23.26★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sirui IronStar IRON-35-N 35mm
- Strong optical (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average build (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Preise
Sirui IronStar IRON-35-N 35mm0.039Score pro Dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064Score pro Dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS bietet 1.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 16 specs.
