Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
Sony
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E
Hasselblad
38 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Travel
Landscape
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Video Cinema
Macro
Portrait
Spezifikationen
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II | Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 100 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 16 |
| Groups | 8 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 3 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 5★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/5.6 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | 2.8-4 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Hasselblad XCD |
| Format | APS-C★ | medium-format |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.11 kg★ | 0.89 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 86 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 500 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x | 1:4.0★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong optical (69th percentile)
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E
- Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average build (21st percentile)
Preise
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II0.214Score pro Dollar
vs
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E0.008Score pro Dollar
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II bietet 26.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
Scores 74 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
