Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm

Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm

Swarovski
40 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Sony
99
Swarovski
30
Budget
Sony
91
Swarovski
40
Street
Sony
90
Swarovski
50
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Swarovski
42
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Swarovski
40
Landscape
Sony
79
Swarovski
28
Portrait
Sony
77
Swarovski
53
Professional
Sony
77
Swarovski
39
Macro
Sony
68
Swarovski
25

Spezifikationen

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSSwarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm23 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm23 mm
Elements9—
Groups8—
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements1★—
Coating—Apochromatic
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5—
Min Aperture3.5-5.6—
Constant✗—
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountSony ET2
FormatAPS-C★micro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.33 kg
Filter Thread41 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus—
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★—
Max Magnification0.215x★—

Vor- & Nachteile

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm

  • Strong aperture (65th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Preise

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is 123 $ cheaper (1.4x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.261Score pro Dollar
vs
Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm0.085Score pro Dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS bietet 3.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen