Sony E SELP16502 16-50mm

Sony E SELP16502 16-50mm

Sony
85 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox
71 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Sony
95
Viltrox
59
Wildlife Sports
Sony
87
Viltrox
65
Budget
Sony
86
Viltrox
68
Street
Sony
84
Viltrox
71
Video Cinema
Sony
80
Viltrox
62
Landscape
Sony
79
Viltrox
50
Portrait
Sony
77
Viltrox
64
Professional
Sony
72
Viltrox
53
Macro
Sony
58
Viltrox
61

Spezifikationen

Sony E SELP16502 16-50mmViltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm35 mm
Elements911
Groups89
Aspherical Elements41
ED Elements11
Coatingnano multi-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/1.7
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.11 kg0.17 kg
Filter Thread41 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm330 mm
Max Magnification0.215x1:7.7

Vor- & Nachteile

Sony E SELP16502 16-50mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

  • Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Preise

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm is 205 $ cheaper (2.4x less).

Sony E SELP16502 16-50mm0.243Score pro Dollar
vs
Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm0.493Score pro Dollar

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm bietet 2.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: Sony E SELP16502 16-50mm

Scores 85 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Sony E SELP16502 16-50mm Besser bei:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm Besser bei:

Macro

Auch in Betracht ziehen