Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM

Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM

Canon
87 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Sony
94
Canon
70
Street
Sony
91
Canon
72
Budget
Sony
91
Canon
83
Macro
Sony
66
Canon
90
Professional
Sony
81
Canon
89
Wildlife Sports
Sony
89
Canon
81
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Canon
82
Landscape
Sony
83
Canon
83
Portrait
Sony
81
Canon
69

Spezifikationen

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSCanon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm20 mm
Elements916
Groups812
Aspherical Elements43
ED Elements14
CoatingAir Sphere and SWC Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/10
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.11 kg0.57 kg
Filter Thread41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm20 mm
Max Magnification0.215x0.12x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile

Preise

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is 1.899 $ cheaper (6.5x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.259Score pro Dollar
vs
Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM0.039Score pro Dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS bietet 6.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Besser bei:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM Besser bei:

MacroProfessional

Auch in Betracht ziehen