Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM 24-240mm
Canon
54 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Travel
Budget
Street
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Portrait
Professional
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM 24-240mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 240 mm |
| Elements | 9 | — |
| Groups | 8 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 1★ | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/6.3 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Canon RF |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.11 kg | 0.08 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Nano USM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM 24-240mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
Preise
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.255Score pro Dollar
vs
Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM 24-240mm0.053Score pro Dollar
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS bietet 4.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
