Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Nikon
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm
Rokinon
41 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Portrait
Street
Macro
Travel
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm | Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 135 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 85 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | — | 11 |
| Groups | — | 7 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | 0 |
| ED Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| Coating | Super Integrated Coating | Ultra Multi-Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Canon EF |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weight | 0.48 kg★ | 0.81 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | AF-S | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 380 mm★ | 790 mm |
Vor- & Nachteile
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
- Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
- Below average build (26th percentile)
Preise
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.371Score pro Dollar
vs
Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm0.105Score pro Dollar
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm bietet 3.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 20 specs.
