Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm
Laowa
55 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Nikon
89 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Portrait
Street
Macro
Travel
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm | Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | ultra-wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 12 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 12 mm | 85 mm |
| Elements | 16 | — |
| Groups | 10 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 2 |
| Coating | Frog Eye Coating | Super Integrated Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Nikon F |
| Format | Full-Frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | — |
| Weight | 0.61 kg | 0.48 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | AF-S |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 180 mm★ | 380 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.2x★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm
- Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
- Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
Preise
Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm0.065Score pro Dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.371Score pro Dollar
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm bietet 5.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.
