Laowa Argus 28mm f/1.2 28mm
Laowa
28 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma 207975
Sigma
85 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Street
Macro
Portrait
Travel
Budget
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Laowa Argus 28mm f/1.2 28mm | Sigma 207975 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | wide-angle-zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 10 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 18 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 13 |
| Groups | 7 | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | 0 | 1★ |
| ED Elements | 2 | 4★ |
| Coating | UHR glass | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.2 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 13★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.56 kg | 0.26 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm | 117 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:14.3 | 1:4 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Laowa Argus 28mm f/1.2 28mm
- Strong optical (68th percentile)
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Sigma 207975
- Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
Preise
Laowa Argus 28mm f/1.2 28mm0.059Score pro Dollar
vs
Sigma 2079750.158Score pro Dollar
Sigma 207975 bietet 2.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma 207975
Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
